
What Pistol Do Navy SEALs Use?
Quick answer: Navy SEALs currently use the Glock 19 as their standard sidearm. The compact 9mm pistol was added to the SEALs inventory in 2015-2016 with a plan to replace the SIG Sauer P226 (Mk25) after SEAL Teams evaluated it for reliability, weight, and compatibility with suppressors. Some units also carry SIG Sauer M18s, aligned with broader military adoption.
Few questions capture the public's imagination quite like the gear carried by the world's most elite special operations force. The pistol a Navy SEAL carries isn't chosen arbitrarily—it's the result of years of field testing, operational feedback, and evolving mission requirements. Getting it wrong in combat isn't an option.
Over the decades, Naval Special Warfare (NSW) has transitioned through several iconic sidearms, each reflecting the tactical priorities of its era. From the battle-proven M1911 to the SIG Sauer P226 Mk25 and now the Glock 19, each change tells a story about how special operations warfare has evolved.
This post breaks down exactly what pistol Navy SEALs carry today, why the Glock 19 became the standard, what happened to the beloved Mk25, and how the broader U.S. military's adoption of the SIG Sauer M17/M18 fits into the picture. Whether you're a firearms enthusiast, a military history buff, or simply curious, here's the full story.
What Do Navy SEALs Carry Now?
The answer to the question "What handgun do Navy SEALs use?" is the Glock 19 Gen 5. It is the current standard sidearm of Navy SEALs. It's a compact, striker-fired 9mm pistol that holds 15 rounds in a standard magazine—and it has earned its place on the hip of NSW operators through a combination of reliability, versatility, and simplicity.
Compared to its predecessors, the Glock 19 is lighter, easier to maintain in the field, and highly compatible with the suppressor systems and weapon lights SEALs routinely use. Its shorter barrel and grip make it easier to conceal during sensitive site exploitation and direct action missions where a low profile matters.
The Glock 19 entered service with SEAL Teams around 2015–2016, following an internal NSW evaluation that prioritized modularity and real-world durability over the larger, heavier metal-framed pistols the teams had carried for years. Special Operations Command (SOCOM) had already been moving toward Glock platforms across various units, and NSW followed suit after operators in the field advocated for the switch.

Why Was the Glock 19 Selected?
Several factors drove the selection of the Glock 19 over the outgoing SIG Sauer Mk25. Why did Navy SEALs switch to Glock? Here's why:
- Weight: The Glock 19 weighs approximately 23.63 oz loaded, compared to the Mk25's loaded weight of around 34 oz. Over a 12-hour mission, that difference matters.
- Reliability in harsh conditions: Glock's polymer frame and simple internal design have a well-documented track record of functioning in sand, water, and extreme temperatures—environments SEALs operate in routinely.
- Suppressor compatibility: The Glock 19 MOS (Modular Optic System) variant accepts red dot sights, and the Gen 5 threaded barrel variant integrates cleanly with suppressor systems.
- Simplicity of maintenance: Fewer parts mean fewer points of failure. In the field, a pistol that's easy to strip and clean under stress is a tactical advantage.
- Commonality: As Glock platforms spread across law enforcement and special operations communities, commonality in training, spare parts, and ammunition logistics became a practical benefit.
NSW didn't adopt the Glock 19 because it was revolutionary. They adopted it because it was the right tool—dependable, light, and adaptable.

What Happened to the Mk25?
For about three decades, the Navy SEAL Sig Sauer P226 Mk25 was the sidearm of Navy SEALs. Its retirement from the primary SEAL sidearm role is worth understanding in full.
The P226 entered U.S. military evaluation in the early 1980s as the Army ran its XM9 trials to replace the aging M1911A1. SIG Sauer's entry outscored several competitors on reliability and accuracy. The Army ultimately selected the Beretta M9 on cost grounds—but the Navy SEALs took notice of the P226's performance and adopted it as their own.
The specific variant used by SEALs, designated the Mk25, featured an anchor engraved on the frame, a corrosion-resistant finish suited to maritime operations, and a Picatinny rail for mounting weapon lights. It was chambered in 9mm, held 15 rounds, and was regarded as one of the most accurate and reliable full-sized service pistols in the world.
SEALs carried the Mk25 through some of the most consequential special operations missions in history—including Operations in Afghanistan and Iraq following 9/11. Its reputation was, and remains, exceptional.
So why did it go?
The core issue wasn't reliability—the Mk25 never failed SEALs in that regard. The issue was evolution. As missions became more gear-intensive and operators were already carrying heavy loads of body armor, communications equipment, and primary weapons, the weight of a full-sized metal-framed pistol became harder to justify. The Mk25, loaded, tips the scales at roughly 34 ounces. The Glock 19, loaded, comes in at under 24 ounces. That's nearly three-quarters of a pound shed from a secondary weapon most operators hope never to use.
Suppressor integration also played a role. The Glock 19's design lends itself more naturally to modern suppressor and optics mounting systems that NSW was increasingly fielding. Updating the Mk25's platform to match became less practical than transitioning to a lighter, modular alternative.
The Mk25 wasn't abandoned because it was flawed. It was retired because the Glock 19 better fit the direction NSW was heading. Many operators who transitioned spoke highly of the P226 long after the switch—it simply belonged to a different era of special operations.
Some Mk25s remain in NSW inventory as backup or training weapons. The pistol's legacy is secure. It's just no longer the one on the hip.

Where Do the P320, M17, and M18 Fit In?
While the Glock 19 is the standard SEAL sidearm, the broader U.S. military picture includes SIG Sauer's M17 and M18—the full-size and compact variants of the P320, respectively.
In 2017, the U.S. Army selected the SIG Sauer P320 as the winner of the Modular Handgun System (MHS) competition, designating it the M17 (full-size) and M18 (compact carry). The M18 in particular has seen wide adoption across multiple service branches, including the U.S. Marine Corps, Air Force, and Navy.
Within Naval Special Warfare, some units and individual operators have been reported carrying the M18, particularly where interoperability with other service branches or joint task forces creates a logistical benefit. The M18's modular grip system—allowing the frame to be reconfigured in size and caliber—makes it an appealing option in certain contexts.
That said, the Glock 19 remains the dominant choice within SEAL Teams specifically. The M17/M18 is more relevant to the broader NSW support community, Naval Special Warfare Support Activity (NSWSA), and joint operations environments where standardization with conventional forces matters.
The short version: SEALs carry Glocks. The wider Navy special operations enterprise carries a mix, with SIG Sauer M18s present but not the primary SEAL sidearm.
Navy SEAL Sidearm Timeline: From the M1911 to the Glock 19
|
Era |
Sidearm |
Years in Service (NSW) |
Why the Change? |
|---|---|---|---|
|
World War II – Vietnam |
M1911A1 |
~1942–1980s |
Standard U.S. military sidearm; .45 ACP, all-metal, highly reliable but heavy and limited in capacity |
|
Post-Vietnam – 1980s |
Beretta M9 |
Brief/limited NSW use |
Army-wide adoption after XM9 trials; SEALs evaluated it but preferred higher-performing alternatives |
|
1980s – ~2015 |
SIG Sauer P226 / Mk25 |
~1986–2016 |
Outperformed competitors in XM9 trials; Navy adopted P226 specifically; Mk25 variant built for maritime ops |
|
~2015–Present |
Glock 19 |
2015–Present |
Lighter, modular, suppressor-compatible, lower maintenance burden; adopted after internal NSW evaluation |
Note: Transition years are approximate and based on available reporting. Special operations units often phase transitions over time rather than switching overnight.
What the Sidearm Choice Reveals About Modern SEAL Operations
The shift from the Mk25 to the Glock 19 reflects something broader about how special operations have changed since the early 2000s. Post-9/11 warfare placed enormous physical demands on operators. Gear loads increased dramatically. The pistol, always a secondary weapon, had to justify its weight on the kit.
Lighter, more modular platforms won out—not because accuracy or reliability declined in importance, but because the overall system had to fit into a more demanding operational profile. A pistol that integrates seamlessly with suppressors, red dot optics, and weapon lights, while shedding unnecessary weight, is simply more useful to a modern SEAL than one that merely shoots well.
The Glock 19 checks every box. That's why it's still on the hip.

Frequently Asked Questions
What is the current Navy SEAL pistol?
Navy SEALs currently carry the Glock 19 Gen 5 as their standard sidearm. The compact 9mm pistol replaced the SIG Sauer P226 Mk25 around 2015–2016 following an internal evaluation by Naval Special Warfare. The Glock 19 was selected for its lighter weight, reliability in harsh environments, and compatibility with suppressors and optics.
Do Navy SEALs still use the P226?
The SIG Sauer P226 Mk25 is no longer the primary SEAL sidearm. It was slowly phased out starting around 2015–2016 in favor of the Glock 19. Some Mk25s remain in NSW inventory for training or backup use, but the P226 is no longer the standard-issue sidearm for SEAL Teams.
Why did the SEALs switch to Glock?
SEALs switched to the Glock 19 as their primary Navy SEAL handgun primarily for weight reduction, improved modularity, and better suppressor compatibility. The Glock 19 weighs approximately 10 ounces less than the loaded Mk25—a meaningful difference on extended operations. Its simpler design also reduces maintenance demands in the field. The switch reflected a broader trend across special operations communities toward lighter, more adaptable platforms.
Is the Glock 19 used by other special operations forces?
Yes. The Glock 19 is widely used across U.S. and allied special operations communities, including Army Special Forces (Green Berets), the FBI's Hostage Rescue Team, and various allied NATO special operations units. Its adoption across elite forces reflects its reputation for reliability and versatility.
What is the difference between the M17 and M18?
The M17 is the full-size variant of the SIG Sauer P320, adopted by the U.S. military in 2017. The M18 is the compact carry variant of the same platform. The U.S. Army, Marines, Air Force, and Navy have all adopted the M18 to varying degrees. Within SEAL Teams specifically, the Glock 19 remains the primary sidearm, though some NSW-adjacent units use the M18.
Updated September 2026.
26 comments
“A favorite of troops who carried it because of its reliability and stopping power”
That’s a myth, unfortunately. Lt. Col. John B. George, a Marine who fought in Guadalcanal in WW2, wrote in his 1947 memoir “Shots Fired in Anger” that “the .45ACP wasn’t worth it’s salt as a military weapon”. Tunnel rats in Vietnam thought it was “too big, too cumbersome, and too loud”. Helicopter pilots often left it behind for “various personal reasons, primarily inaccuracy and weight”.
What did troops actually like carrying? It was the humble .38 revolver; in fact, in 1982, 30% of pistols in military inventory were .38 revolvers.
The M1911 as a combat pistol was never that popular among troops, but as a civilian target pistol? That’s where it really shined.
I carried a 1911 for yrs. Love the .45acp round. When the Glock 17 came out I wasn’t a fan of it. For me handguns were steel and wood. The G19 came out and I started appreciating the weapon. Now an old man, I carry a G43X. Very light and has never hiccuped.
before deploying to the Vietnam War Games i had my clunker M-911 made into match condition. I never got to use it in combat because we SEALs did mostly spray and pray type shooting.
I have that pistol in my gun safe because it is “second to none” of all the G.I. (government issue) sidearms.
E. “Doc Rio” Riojas
USN Ret.
It’s old, heavy ,etc. But I lucked into a stainless cz75. Year’s ago.
10k rds. N she still runs, n. Is more accurate than I am.
When I was n navy, we still trained with 1911’s & M14s you know, REAL WEAPONS The cz is only other pistol I’d trust
Only one pistol I carry every day is a 1911 a1 45. I work armed security and I carry the 1911 on and off duty. My 1911 has never given me any problems. All these other hand guns do not cut the mustard when it comes to knock down power. Buy all your high priced crap and put it up against the old 1911 and see who comes out ahead.
Beretta, Sig, and Glock
Nothing But high priced Junk I carried a 1911
in Viet Nam for two years and had no problems in That that nasty country. That all i got to say. Thanks Have a nice day .
Everyone has an opinion, remember this, the non-military types, politicians decide what you carry, even if you think otherwise.
Having fired the Beretta M9 and the Sig M17, there is considerable differences. The Beretta was fat and heavy, I thought it was weak and considerable issues every time. The M17, lighter, more adaptable and more shooting with less malfunctions. I think when looking for a defense weapon for home or operation, it depends on the shooter, dependability and construction.
Sig all the way🇨🇱
I was at Little Creek in NSW at that time, when the P226 was adopted. I was also a weapons specialist and directly involved in that situation. The M9 failures were catastrophic slide failures, and I personally knew of at least 6 myself. Beretta started the rumor about us using high pressure ammo in their pistols as damage control- we had no high pressure ammo in inventory, just WCC NATO ball was what we used. NWC Crane tested the failed slides and found that Beretta had improperly heat treated the steel. Ours were some of the first pistols made in the new US factory, so perhaps their production wasn’t up to speed yet. We commonly fired thousands of rounds per week so it didn’t take long to find issues in equipment.
The first batches of P226s that we received were off the shelf pistols, and they were heavily tested by NWC Crane before they were purchased in quantity. Those pistols had a fabricated slide, no rail, no chrome lined bore. The stainless milled slide and those other features came years later.
The SIG was one of the most reliable weapons that we had in inventory. We used them in all kinds of extreme conditions and I was impressed with their durability and reliability. We had several other handguns in inventory to choose from and the SIG was by far the most reliable, and probably the most accurate. My newest M1911A1 was made in 1947, I believe.
I heard that the decision to pick the M9 over the SIG was purely political. I won’t get into specifics but I knew the people directly involved in the selection program. When politics get involved the warfighter usually suffers.
The bickering within the firearms community is hilarious. This comment section is a perfect example. Glock, Berreta, and Sig all make great weapons. The P226 and M9 just have more sex appeal than a stick of butter with a handle on it. They’re all grade A pistols that I would trust my life to. I own all three but the P226 stays on my kit.
Recently talked to members of a Seal Team based in Norfolk Virginia, members who had returned from Iraq. They had been using the Sig M17 and had high marks for it.
The Sig P226 is heavy. It may kick less and give you a touch more accuracy in the first few rounds. But sending a few clips down the barrel is fatiguing. That would make a difference in a long fire fight.
As a backup gun, it would be great. As a primary shooter, in close combat, I might prefer the Glock.
The SEALS were using non standard ammo when the M9 failure occurred. The pressure greatly exceeded any known ammo (NATO) or commercial. The part that failed was the slide not the barrel, The slide separated with the rear portion striking the shooter. The only “weak” area of the M9 and other Berettas of that series would have to be recessed area in which the barrel link operates. Overall the pistol is about as reliable as anybody could reasonably expect.
Makes sense. Glocks will probably outlast all those guns. We had issues with Berettas in the Army. Money has nothing to do with their decision. Special Operations command has a pretty big budget and what they want is what they will get. A funny trend is that Elite forces always choose the wepon they like and goes against is standard to regular conventional units. And as of now , Seals, Grenn Berets, Marsoc, Rangers and Delta all went with the Glock 19. The M17 is pretty but hasnt seen any combat. They will see more vault time than anything else.
Hi usamm.com webmaster, Great job!
Hello usamm.com owner, Thanks for the comprehensive post!